Sacco E., Prayer-Galetti T., Pinto F. et al. Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2006;97(6):1234–41.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464 410X.2006.06185.x.
Bauer R.M., Ameli G., Schultz-Lampel D., Rutkowski M. Stress urinary incontinence in men. Urologe A 2021;60(1):109–18. (In Germ.).
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01395-3.
Burkhard F.C., Bosch J.L.H.R., Cruz F. et al. Urinary Incontinence / Guidelines of European Association of Urology (EAU). Available at:https://uroweb.org/guideline/urinary-incontinence/.
Van der Aa F., Drake M.J., Kasyan G.R. et al. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol 2013;63(4):681–9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034.
Sacco E., Gandi C., Marino F. et al. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study. BJU Int 2021;127(2):229–37.
DOI: 10.1111/bju.15197.
Foley F.E.B. An artificial sphincter; a new device and operation for control of enuresis and urinary incontinence. J Urol 1947;58(4):250–9.
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)69552-1.
Scott F.B., Bradley W.E., Timm G.W. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology 1973;1(3):252–9.
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90749-8.
Rouse D.J., Brown J.N. Jr., Whitten R.P. Methodology for NASA technology transfer in medicine. Med Instrum 1981;15(4):234–6.
Furlow W.L. Implantation of a new semiautomatic artificial genitourinary sphincter: Experience with primary activation and deactivation in 47 patients. J Urol 1981;126(6):741–4.
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54726-6.
Light J.K., Reynolds J.C. Impact of the new cuff design on reliability of the AS800 artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 1992;147(3):609–11.
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37319-6.
Elliott D.S., Barrett D.M. Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol 1998;159(4):1206–8.
Carson C. Artificial urinary sphincter: current status and future directions. Asian J Androl 2020;22(2):154–7.
DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_5_20.
Ostrowski I., Blewniewski M., Neugart F. et al. Multicentre experience with ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. Urologia 2017;84(3):148–52.
DOI: 10.5301/uj.5000246.
Ostrowski I., Ciechan J., Sledz E. et al. Four-year follow-up on a Zephyr Surgical Implants 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence from one urological centre in Poland. Cent European J Urol 2018;71(3):320–5.
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1704.
Weibl P., Hoelzel R., Rutkowski M., Huebner W. VICTO and VICTO-plus – novel alternative for the management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Early perioperative and postoperative experience. Cent Eur J Urol 2018;71(2):248–9.
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1655.
Ludwig T.A., Reiss P., Wieland M. et al. The ARTUS device: The first feasibility study in human cadavers. Can J Urol 2015;22(6):8100–4.
Lima S.V.C., de Barros E.G.C., de Oliveira Vilaret F. et al. Artificial sphincter “BR – SL – AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study. Int Braz J Urol 2018;44(6):1215–23.
DOI: 10.1590/S16775538.IBJU.2018.0128.
Касян Г.Р., Ахвледиани Н.Д., Лысачев Д.А. и др. Недержание мочи у мужчин. Методические рекомендации № 60. М.: АБВ-пресс, 2019. Доступно по:http://www.urogynecology.ru/files/nodus_items/0001/0784/file-784-1586498199.pdf..
Guralnick M.L., Miller E., Toh K.L., Webster G.D. Transcorporeal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol 2002;167(5):2075–8; discussion 2079.
Wilson S.K., Delk J.R. 2nd, Henry G.D., Siegel A.L. New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol 2003;169(1):261–4.
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000040661.45037.47.
Carr L.K., Robert M., Kultgen P.L. et al. Autologous muscle derived cell therapy for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective, dose ranging study. J Urol 2013;189(2):595–601.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.028.
Yafi F.A., Powers M.K., Zurawin J., Hellstrom W.J.G. Contemporary review of artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence. Sex Med Rev 2016;4(2):157–66.
DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.11.004.
Linder B.J., Rivera M.E., Ziegelmann M.J., Elliot D.S. Long-term outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement: An analysis of 1082 cases at Mayo Clinic. Urology 2015;86(3):602–7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.029.
Tutolo М., Cornu J.-N., Bauer R.М. et al. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): Results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn 2019;38(2):710–8.
DOI: 10.1002/nau.23901.
Crivellaro S., Morlacco A., Bodo G. et al. Systematic review of surgical treatment of post radical prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2016;35(8):875–81.
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22873.
Ostrowski I., Golabek T., Ciechan J. et al. Preliminary outcomes of the European multicentre experience with the ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men. Cent European J Urol 2019;72(3):263–9.
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1920.
Giammò A., Falcone M., Blecher G. et al. A novel artificial urinary sphincter (VICTO®) for the management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: Description of the surgical technique and preliminary results from a multicenter series. Urol Int 2021;105(5–6):414–20.
DOI: 10.1159/000512722.
Ficarra V., Novara G., Rosen R.C. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62(3):405–17.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045.
Ficarra V., Novara G., Ahlering T.E. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62(3):418–30.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046.
Patel N., Golan R., Halpern J.A. et al. A contemporary analysis of dual inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. J Urol 2019;201(1):141–6.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.046.
Boysen W.R., Cohen A.J., Kuchta K. et al. Combined placement of artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prosthesis does not increase risk of perioperative complications or impact long-term device survival. Urology 2019;124:264–70.
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.033.
Segal R.L., Cabrini M.R., Harris E.D. et al. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation. J Urol 2013;190(6):2183–8.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.084.
Javaroni V. Editorial comment: a contemporary analysis of dual inflatable penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter outcomes. Int Braz J Urol 2020;46(6):1096–7.
DOI: 10.1590/ S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.06.07.
Perrouin-Verbe M.A., Chartier-Kastler E., Even A. et al. Long-term complications of continent cutaneous urinary diversion in adult spinal cord injured patients. Neurourol Urodyn 2016;35(8):1046–50.
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22879.
Sundaram V., Cordon B.H., Hofer M.D., Morey A.F. Is risk of artificial urethral sphincter cuff erosion higher in patients with penile prosthesis? J Sex Med 2016;13(9):1432–7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.06.013.
Guachetá Bomba P.L., Ocampo Flórez G.M., Echeverría García F., García-Perdomo H.A. Effectiveness of surgical management with an adjustable sling versus an artificial urinary sphincter in patients with severe urinary postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ther Adv Urol 2019;11:1756287219875581.
DOI: 10.1177/1756287219875581.
Chen Y.-C., Lin P.-H., Jou Y.-Y., Lin V.C.-H. Surgical treatment for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One 2017;12(5):e0130867.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130867.
Grabbert M., Husch T., Kretschmer A. et al. Comparison of adjustable male slings and artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of male urinary incontinence: a retrospective analysis of patient selection and postoperative continence status. World J Urol 2019;37(7):1415–20.
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2523-0.
Magera J.S. Jr., Elliott D.S. Artificial urinary sphincter infection: causative organisms in a contemporary series J Urol 2008;180(6):2475–8.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.021.
de Cógáin M.R., Elliott D.S. The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate. J Urol 2013;190(1):113–7.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.015.
Husch T., Kretschmer A., Thomsen F. et al. Debates on Male Incontinence (DOMINO)-Project. Antibiotic coating of the artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800): Is it worthwhile? Urology 2017;103:179–84.
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.056.
Bates A.S., Martin R.M., Terry T.R. Complications following artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2015;116(4):623–33.
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13048.
Andreasson A., Fall M., Persson E. et al. High revision rate following artificial urethral sphincter implantation. Scand J Urol 2014;48(6):544–8.
DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2014.925498.